Powered By Blogger

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

The Decline of Richesse.



“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.”

Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1961



A Republican friend of mine, whom I respect greatly for his intellect as well as his congeniality, recently opined that the Democratic propensity is to hate the military. This notion of a Democratic antipathy to the armed forces is supported by his assertion that the military vote ten to one for Republicans. Perhaps they do, although I have not checked the accuracy of that assertion, but it is a misconception that Democrats hate the soldiers, most of whom are volunteers for a duty others will not do. Today’s military is composed of an elite career officer corps and enlisted men who volunteer, often with the idea that service to their country is noble, sometimes because they are escaping poverty, and often for a secure, structured environment. Many of the volunteers are very young, and have not yet learned of the horror of war. George W. Bush, who himself avoided combat, had very little compunction in embroiling our country in two disastrous wars that still have not proven their value.

The fact that these gladiators are supported by war profiteers and legislators both from the Republican and Democratic parties, makes them no less victimized by the illusion that the United States is responsible for making the world safe from rogue governments that spring up around the globe or other threats from amorphous terrorists.

These “threats” supposedly justify a $700 billion defense budget, when we as a nation are struggling with underfunded schools, decrepit highways, and a 19th century rail system.
This idea of an American colossus, a dynamic hegemonic enterprise straddling the globe has vanished with our manufacturing base, a decaying rust belt of post industrial cities, inhabited by the unemployed, the disenfranchised, the dispossessed.

The present Republican leadership believes that fewer taxes on their corporate benefactors will revive our flagging economy, and are busy selling the notion that all Americans will benefit from more jobs created by the effect of the long-discredited “trickle-down” theory. Democrats believe that the government should invest more, publicly fund research, invest in infrastructure and modestly raise taxes to do so. Somewhere between these two increasingly polarized positions should be a solution.

One thing is certain—the United States has neither the economic wherewithal nor the moral ability to police the world. Drunk on oil, hypocritically pious and in hoc, it now must co-exist in an increasingly hostile and threatening world. Faster jet planes and more expensive aircraft carriers are no longer the basis for projecting power. We need to turn inwardly strong. More education, better teachers, faster rail, better research, and energy independence—that is where we should be looking. Congressmen up for sale to defense contractors need to be put on notice that playing on the fears of their constituents will no longer get them reelected.

One would hope that the H.L. Mencken was wrong when he said that “no one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.” So far, unfortunately, he has been right.

1 comment:

  1. The uniformed and civilian folks who constitute the military industrial complex might be excused for confusing the disdain of the author for their motivation, processes and accomplishments, with hatred of them and their political views, the centroid of which is the continuation of the current Pax Americana.
    The logical extension of the author’s views is that the present stability in Europe should cease to rest upon the capabilities of USEUCOM, and the resulting power vacuum should be filled by some balance between France, Germany and Russia. I doubt that many Europeans wish to return to that version of stability. Similarly, the author might wish the current stability in the Pacific to become the responsibility of some balance between the nations on its western shores, ignoring the centuries of conflict and occupation. Or, the author might prefer the extension of the relative power vacuum that now exists where the US military does not maintain capability, such as Africa and Mexico.

    The author also sees a significant greed component, which seems odd since the USDOD has an extremely effective auditing function that enforces a profit structure that would be intolerable for the continuation of most businesses. With very few exceptions, almost every uniformed and civilian member of the defense community has almost no opportunity to acquire significant wealth from their efforts. Like auto workers and farmers, they do prefer politicians who agree with the importance of their efforts, but the defense business political contributions and activities are far more restricted by law and regulation than those of trial lawyers and governmental employee unions.

    The author is a nice man and may not wish to think that he hates anyone, but he certainly does not seem to love or honor the defense community. I believe they have learned to live with his opinion.

    ReplyDelete