A national political campaign is better than the best circus ever heard of, with a mass baptism and a couple of hangings thrown in.
H.L. Mencken
H.L. Mencken
So now the race for the White House has begun. A Kentucky Derby field,
eventually diminishing to a Preakness and a Belmont horse race of Republican
politicians all of whom have a new prescription of their vision for the future,
of course tempered by political expediency, PAC money and a host of other issues,
not the least of which should be how they will govern. But the real issues reaching the
American public will really be the distillation of focus groups, advertising
slogans, negative ads, and last but not least the torrent of money from the
Koch Brothers, and Sheldon Adelson,
who are, shall we speculate, interested in advancing their bottom line
through bought politicians (through unlimited campaign contributions.)
All this a result of the disastrous Citizen’s United case,
conservative Republicans justifying it all by claiming that it has unleashed
millions to the Unions thereby balancing the equation. In fact, it has not. The flood of PAC and super PAC money
has corrupted the system, lengthened and polarized gullible voters with a flood of advertising from both sides of
the aisle, 95% of which has no substance.
On top of all
that, we have the warmonger class, the chicken hawks, here at home asserting
that Iran should be bombed now and that if we do not bomb them now, we will be
faced with a nuclear armed Iran, itching to explode the streets of Tel Aviv,
Haifa and Jerusalem—to wipe out the Jewish State, interposing an Armageddon, an
existential threat to the entire world. John McCain and Lindsey Graham, among others are
beating the drums as loudly as they can. And, of course, denouncing any deal as another Munich, if you want to buy the argument of the false equivalence of Iran being another Nazi Germany.
CNN is already chomping at the bit, filling its 24 hour news
cycle with repetitive irrelevancies such as Hillary’s hair color and the
utterances of crazy people like Ted Cruz, who, I am assured by people who knew
him at Princeton, was a brilliant debater. He had, supposedly, the ability to take a side in an
argument, it did not matter which, and argue the other side into
submission. Except he often
outsmarted himself and came in second. I hope, of course, that he has not the ability to fool
most voters who should see through his creepy façade. He even looks like Joseph McCarthy.
As I have written previously, the American Electoral system
is a creaking remnant of the 19th century, except it was better then,
because party bosses picked the candidates, and we were spared two years of
primaries, talking heads and assorted other imbeciles who have no idea where it
is all going, but sit on pundit panels prognosticating and picking out who will
prevail.
Rand Paul, for example, has now moved from being a
libertarian isolationist to a semi-hawkish statesman wannabe. This past week he sat with a bunch of Orthodox
lunatics from Brooklyn, possibly telling them he is actually a member of the
IDF and the Mossad, and also arguing at the same time that it was a mistake to
take out Saddam Hussein and Mummar Quadafi. I am not making this up. This is not an acceptable position to the conservative
base, but presumably he is already thinking about the general election.
Mike Huckabee is campaigning on his God and Jesus platform,
clearly believing that the rapture is on its merry way, and that Jesus will
return to the holy land and save Jews, who, incidentally will not qualify for
heaven without converting to the true faith.
Jeb Bush, trying to overcome the baggage of his brother’s
destruction of Middle Eastern power balances, and the invasion of Iraq on WMDs
that did not exist, proclaiming "mission accomplished," is not quite
sure which path to choose. He says
his brother was a good President, but he also is stuck with the mess W. made,
having to overcome the production
of a lot of maimed and disabled Americans who have families that do not
want another war at a cost of another three trillion dollars that might be better spent repairing our 19th century infrastructure. In addition, the science challenged, religiosity litmus test position of his brother’s administration in the appointments at the NIH the CDC
and other government scientific agencies of religious sycophants does not help
big brother (no pun intended) to convince Americans that another Bush is
suitable for office.
Tragically, though, he is the best the Republicans have.
Chris Christie, an arrogant, pompous, scandal encased
leviathan of political ambition, does not seem to be made of Presidential
timber, an office that requires a temperate, even well-ordered ability to relate to the voter. Not one that is inherently abrasive,
who tells people to "shut up" if they happen to inquire about a
position or even a personal family issue.
Or, not to mention, a bridge scandal and political revenge baked into
his obnoxious persona. And now,
the kicker, his three staff members who have been indicted yesterday over the
George Washington Bridge scandal, and may yet implicate him as a vengeful,
retribution seeking dude who very well knew what was happening or at least
created an atmosphere that allowed it to happen. Good riddance.
Scott Walker, who enraged working people for shutting down
protests for a living wage, a man who disparaged the teachers union and other
elements of Wisconsin society to advance his right wing political agenda. He mentions nothing about income
inequality or that the top 1% now control 90% of the wealth.
Rick Santorum, a religious zealot, who does not understand
the secular trend of American 21st century life, is considering another run,
but he is yesterday’s news, thank goodness. He thinks women should stay home and bear children, not much
else. He is a latter day Christian
ayatollah and pretty stupid at that. His understanding of the new demographic of America is staggeringly ignorant.
Rick Perry thinks that there is a conspiracy to take away
everyone's AK-47 assault rifles
and is "studying up on Foreign Policy."
Perhaps this time he will
remember which country is which and which government department he will
abolish. It certainly will not be
the Defense Department.
And let us not forget the Donald, who this week blamed the
Baltimore riots on the President, referring to him as African-American, but in
a demeaning context. Can one
imagine Trump as president “if he decides to run?” He has a fix for the Baltimore situation, but does not
say what. Presumably he will
unleash his concierges, headwaiters and croupiers to calm down the looters and
rioters, when he emerges from his solid gold apartment on 5th
avenue, leading his legions. I
hope they are at least his Miss Universe contestants.
Last but not least, there is Marco Rubio, a panderer
who will say anything to get elected.
The thought of him becoming President is frightening. He talks about 21st
century ideas, but is firmly stuck in the 1960s. Gay marriage? No. A woman’s right to choose? No. Religion in the schools? Yes. Immigration reform? Maybe. Trickle down economics that have not
worked? Yes, for sure. Repeal Obama care? Yes. Any admission on the
administration's progress on unemployment? No. Any admission that the Auto industry was saved? No. Any acceptance of climate change as a threat to future
generations, or that his home state Florida may soon be under water? "I am
not a scientist.." Well what about the 99% of climate scientists say
so? "I am not a scientist, so
I do not know." How about is
your steak cooked enough?
"I am not a chef."
On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders, a socialist who caucuses
with the Democrats, but is an independent, seeking the Democratic
nomination. Bernie, you are
seeking the Democratic nomination, are you a Democrat? "No, I am an
independent." Bernie,
you need to be a party member if you want to win the nomination. If you want to win the lottery,
buy a ticket.
Hillary and Bill are going to make a fine President and
First Gentleman if they can overcome their integrity issues. Whitewater, Benghazi, and now we have
the email “scandal.” I
do not think they will make Mount Rushmore, but they may be the best choice we
have. At least they have some
ideas that might make the country functional, or semi-functional, depending
upon one's point of view.
So David, how do you REALLY feel about the Republican field?
ReplyDelete